ext_3656 ([identity profile] tibicina.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] khaosworks 2005-12-21 07:29 pm (UTC)

Well, see, Paul's letters (and Revelations for that matter) /shouldn't/ be part of the bible. They should be considered like any other early comentaries - Augustine's, for example. They should not be scripture. I'll give you Acts as scripture, but really everything after that should be a separate volume.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting