I *think* he means that if they don't have the weapons of mass destruction, then obviously someone *does*, since the uranium was supposedly purchased.
I think it's a stupid statement, of course. It makes dozens of assumptions, and presses people who don't really believe there are WMD about at all to prove it's somewhere else. I mean, huh?
Personally, I prefer official Presidential liars to be more flamboyant, like the outrageously funny Iraqi Denier Of Actuality (Assad?) who enlivened the Baghdad scene for a while. AF seems a pompous, poisonous & nasty popsicle, with a stick up his lower torso and self-righteous to the Nth degree. Can't (couldn't) see him without wanting to smack him in the face, but it worries me a bit that he's going 'underground'.
no subject
I think it's a stupid statement, of course. It makes dozens of assumptions, and presses people who don't really believe there are WMD about at all to prove it's somewhere else. I mean, huh?
in the words of Bugs Bunny
no subject
Depends on how good your aim is, doesn't it?
no subject
no subject
no subject