khaosworks (
khaosworks) wrote2008-03-12 09:54 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Fantasy Novelist's Exam
"Ever since J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis created the worlds of Middle Earth and Narnia, it seems like every windbag off the street thinks he can write great, original fantasy, too. The problem is that most of this "great, original fantasy" is actually poor, derivative fantasy. Frankly, we're sick of it, so we've compiled a list of rip-off tip-offs in the form of an exam. We think anybody considering writing a fantasy novel should be required to take this exam first. Answering "yes" to any one question results in failure and means that the prospective novel should be abandoned at once."
Don't necessarily agree with all of its no-nos, but amusing nonetheless.
Don't necessarily agree with all of its no-nos, but amusing nonetheless.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Sounds like you would enjoy it.
no subject
That being said, I've been told that Tough Guide is a send up of the genre, so I might check it out one of these days. Thanks!
no subject
The entry on horses alone is worth the price of the book: "Horses are of a breed unique to Fantasyland. They are capable of galloping full-tilt all day without a rest. Sometimes they do not require food or water. They never cast shoes, go lame or put their hooves down holes, except when the Management deems it necessary, as when the forces of the DARK LORD are only half an hour behind."
It goes on like that. Really funny stuff.
no subject
I think I do have one instance of Unrealistic Cooking Time, but that's easily fixed.
no subject
Discworld is a perfect example of a series that doesn't require trilogies or quintets or what have you. And I keep coming back to Pratchett not just because I love the characters and the world, but because I know once I finish that volume, I'll have consumed a satisfying story, with an actual resolution.
no subject
no subject
Man what?
no subject
In fact (again with the caveat that I'm not a big fantasy reader), there only really seem to be one type of elf in modern heroic fantasy... i.e., the Tolkien mold, and for orcs, two types: the Tolkien completely brutish faceless hordes, and the Warhammer/World of Warcraft model of them as a violent, but viable civilization. It's an almost lazy kind of shorthand, as if the writer can say, "that's an elf" and nothing more need be said because Tolkien's elves have had such a powerful impact on the fantasy reader psyche that everything is visualized in a flash. Ditto with orcs.
Again, not that you can't or shouldn't use them, but the question then becomes, why do you need them, story-wise? What's the thematic or in-story role for them? Or even, why call them "elves" or "orcs" to begin with? Can you call them fae, or goblins, or another made up name? Do they even need to look tall and lanky, or brutish and fang-toothed, as the case may be?
My favourite kinds of elves, though, are the ones that Pratchett wrote about in Lords and Ladies, and Gaiman touched on in his Sandman stories. Beautiful, elegant, powerful, and complete and utter bastards. Which turns the Tolkien expectation of them, which has somehow become more prevalent, on its head and takes the idea of the elf back to its more earthy roots. As it should be.
no subject
But then, I'm a Celt and know the original stories and legends!
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Also, noting your mention of Pratchett, it looks like a checklist he might use.)
no subject
no subject