Active Entries
- 1: [fanfic] Old Steel
- 2: My tweets
- 3: My tweets
- 4: My tweets
- 5: My tweets
- 6: My tweets
- 7: My tweets
- 8: My tweets
- 9: (no subject)
- 10: Khaotic twitters
Style Credit
- Style: Denim for Basic Boxes by
- Resources: On the Down Low
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-03-24 04:58 pm (UTC)What it comes down to is this 25 January memo to Condi Rice where Clarke says he outlined his concerns about Al-Qaeda. The White House has not denied its existence, not has it denied that it tabled the proposals. At best then, the White House's defense - which is only on record from an unnamed "official" - is that it wasn't an effective plan. The best way to prove this claim by the White House, then, would be to produce the memo. Shall we call for it?
But that's not all - what about the claim that immediately after 9/11 the President told Clarke to find a connection between Iraq and the attack, which subsequently when found that none existed, the administration told the intelligence services to go back and try again? McClellan claims that there is no record of Bush having this conversation with Clarke, or that Bush was in the Situation Room on 9/12.
To repeat Jon Stewart's incredulity - the day after the most horrific terrorist attack on American soil, the President did not go into the Situation Room? Where the Hell was he? Can we see the records, please?
The problem is not really whether Bush could have prevented 9/11. That's just one allegation. The more pressing issue, for which more and more evidence is mounting, from Clarke, from Paul O'Neill, from Karen Kwaitkowski, that the administration wanted a connection between Iraq and Al-Qaeda where none existed to justify the war against Iraq. The fact that America went to war on grounds exaggerated at best, fabricated at worst, but in any case deceptive, remains.