khaosworks: (Default)
[personal profile] khaosworks
Ink-jet printing creates tubes of living tissue
Three-dimensional tubes of living tissue have been printed using modified desktop printers filled with suspensions of cells instead of ink. The work is a first step towards printing complex tissues or even entire organs.

"This could have the same kind of impact that Gutenberg's press did," claims tissue engineer Vladimir Mironov of the Medical University of South Carolina.

Many labs can now print arrays of DNA, proteins or even cells. But for tissue engineers, the big challenge is creating three-dimensional structures. Mironov became interested when Thomas Boland of Clemson University, also in South Carolina, told Mironov how he could print biomaterials using modified ink-jet printers.

The printers are adapted by washing out the ink cartridges and refilling them with suspensions of, say, cells. The software that controls the viscosity, electrical resistances and temperature of the printing fluids is reprogrammed and the feed systems altered.
"Dude! Run me off a couple of kidneys for Mrs McNulty here!"

Date: 2003-01-23 05:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] browngirl.livejournal.com
Ooooh!

A.
thinking that's just so cool!
(I should say something more intelligent, what with my degree in Biology and all. Anyway.)

Date: 2003-01-23 06:59 am (UTC)
camwyn: Me in a bomber jacket and jeans standing next to a green two-man North Andover Flight Academy helicopter. (Default)
From: [personal profile] camwyn
I'm not entirely sure where the idea came from. I think it has to do with the fact that every time I'm with [livejournal.com profile] cadhla and [livejournal.com profile] batyatoon at the same time we wind up playing How Treyf Is That?, but...

If human tissue can be extruded this way - from a cell line ten or twenty generations removed from the original, scooped-out-of-a-human cells - is it still cannibalism? I mean, the original cells were human, and the tissue would (presumably) work if it were implanted into a human being - but it came out of a printer, for God's sake. If someone at the lab put a slab of the stuff in your bologna sandwich or moo shu pork as a perverted joke, would you be a cannibal or just a fratboy someone who ate something really disgusting?

Date: 2003-01-23 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khaosworks.livejournal.com
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913):

Cannibalism \Can"ni*bal*ism\, n. [Cf. F. cannibalisme.]
The act or practice of eating human flesh by mankind. Hence;
Murderous cruelty; barbarity. --Berke.

-----------------

From WordNet (r) 1.7:

cannibalism
n : the practice of eating the flesh of your own kind


So, yeah. Coming from a printer or a sentient being, it's still human flesh, and flesh of your own kind, so if you eat it, it's cannibalism.

Date: 2003-01-23 07:15 am (UTC)
camwyn: Me in a bomber jacket and jeans standing next to a green two-man North Andover Flight Academy helicopter. (Default)
From: [personal profile] camwyn
Well, I'm not so sure that it remains flesh of your own kind after ten generations of being in a lab dish, but okay. Next question:

If you donated the original cells yourself, is it cannibalism or simply the equivalent of chewing off a dried bit of your lip?

(Look, the bioethicists only ask the questions that the normal people would think of. The real problems lie out in the territory where only the whackjobs live, and by the time the question gets forced upon the public, you've got Raelians and it's too late to do anything about it. Unless something like this comes up.)

Date: 2003-01-23 07:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khaosworks.livejournal.com
I suppose it's a matter of degree and intent. Chewing off a bit of your own lip isn't meant as a means of sustenance for you, so that's probably not cannibalistic. Chowing down on a human liver, even your own, on the other hand...

Ultimately, cannibalism is a social taboo because of a couple of things: it isn't conducive to population growth if people start slaughtering each other like animals for food, and for health reasons - the entire problem with CJD, kuru, and all that. Now, if those problems were eliminated, the first due to mass production of human tissue and the second thanks to genetic manipulation, then the basis for the social taboo wouldn't apply. Now, that doesn't mean it isn't cannibalism by definition, it just means that there's no good reason to protest except on cultural grounds.

(F'rex, I oppose human cloning because they've yet to show satisfactorily that they've solved the problem of genetic defects and rapid aging. If that were solved, then my only objection would be to specific purposes of cloning - such as a slave race, or organ replacement reasons. Apart from that, there would be no good reason to oppose cloning except on cultural grounds - and maybe genetic diversity grounds or overpopulation grounds)

So if the reasons for the social taboo no longer apply, and the cultural icky factor can be overcome then cannibalism simply wouldn't be taboo anymore. Then you can have "Long Pig" establishments like in the comic Transmetropolitan, or bastard farms (growing anaencephalic clones for organ donation or consumption purposes) - Today's Special: French People.

Date: 2003-01-23 08:12 am (UTC)
camwyn: Me in a bomber jacket and jeans standing next to a green two-man North Andover Flight Academy helicopter. (Default)
From: [personal profile] camwyn
OK, fair enough. Wish I'd kept my Psychological Anthropology term paper on food taboos; this'd make a lovely addition. In the meantime I shall go back to the thought of the pimple-faced kid in the hospital's duplication center...

"I said I needed two. Not twenty."
"Sorry, man."
"What am I supposed to do with twenty corneas?"

December 2011

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 12th, 2026 06:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios