Pictures of Torture
May. 4th, 2004 02:40 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yes, I've been hearing about the torture pictures. How could one not?
No, I'm not surprised, nor should anyone who knows about United States military history overseas. The Philippines. Haiti. Korea. Vietnam.
Imperialistic, paternalistic motives produce imperialistic attitudes. Great white hunter go tame natives, make monkeys dance.
To be fair, of course, I'm not saying that every American soldier in Iraq is doing this - the vast majority are probably fine, decent people. The roots, however, of this are cultural, and structural, and are built into the American psychological landscape. Most people simply aren't aware of it, or have conveniently forgotten. If you don't keep an eye on those demons, they're going to sneak up and sucker punch you.
No, I'm not surprised, nor should anyone who knows about United States military history overseas. The Philippines. Haiti. Korea. Vietnam.
Imperialistic, paternalistic motives produce imperialistic attitudes. Great white hunter go tame natives, make monkeys dance.
To be fair, of course, I'm not saying that every American soldier in Iraq is doing this - the vast majority are probably fine, decent people. The roots, however, of this are cultural, and structural, and are built into the American psychological landscape. Most people simply aren't aware of it, or have conveniently forgotten. If you don't keep an eye on those demons, they're going to sneak up and sucker punch you.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 05:50 am (UTC)Which brings up a point...The American public should accept that we are an Imperium, or do something about it.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 08:23 am (UTC)The story is believable. Not necessarily true, of course.
But it makes me want to quote Sherman Potter: "You had to put be stupid at the top of your list of things to do today."
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 08:58 am (UTC)To be fair, this kind of behavior is hardly limited to Americans or the cultural aspects of Americans. This, my friend, is human nature. The fact that we're (collectively) appalled that this went on is a sign that the American psychological landscape is trying its best to overcome that human nature. I'm glad that the vast majority is shocked by this, as it is a sign that such behavior is not considered normal or acceptable and it is in fact shocking. I have no doubt that such horrific treatment of prisoners (or war and otherwise) goes on daily all over the world, but the fact that Americans do it shocks the majority of the American public does give me hope that we're either A) really trying to overcome the aspects of human nature that let us dehumanize prisoners or B) naive to a fault. Call me an optimist but I believe option A is the majority here; sure there's option B types but I think us As are in the lead.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:16 am (UTC)Sure, other nations have done this. The rape of Nanking by the Japanese Imperial Army, for example. The SAS have done much worse to its captives. What amuses me is that some Americans seem shocked that this could ever be done by Americans.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:04 am (UTC)Hm. Time for a little Devil's Advocation...
You mean to imply that they arent built into anyone else's? As if Americans were somehow different than any other human beings? As if the Soviets (and later Russia) has been squeaky clean? Or Communist China? As if the Somalis and folks in Serbia were graciously inviting each other over for tea and biscuits?
You make great pains to show American transgressions, and make it sound as if those were somehow unique and correctible. But when you look at most nations on the planet, when given a clear opportunity, they behave pretty badly. Big, small, it doesn't seem to matter.
Homo sapiens has a nasty streak. There's something on the order of 140,000 troops in Iraq, plus additional US government employees and civilian contractors. We're talking about a group of people the size of a notable city. Unless you think that somehow the US government has got hold of and uses psychological screening techniques advanced beyond normal modern sicence, you're going to have to expect criminal activity among these people on the order of a small city! Do you think Dayton, Ohio doesn't see worse in any given year?
Do not blame on American culture that which is generally displayed the world over.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:16 am (UTC)Imperialism as an attitude is built into American foreign policy to a much larger extent, I would argue, than any other world power right now. The British lost most of that smug, self-superior attitude when they lost the Empire, and it transferred over to the US.
Which is not to say that it's not in human nature to be a bastard when you're the top dog, but that we shouldn't be surprised that Americans are.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:21 am (UTC)Many years later, when I was an analyst at Quantico, I asked one of the command historians there about this institutionalized policy of teaching *all* of our history to every Marine. His opinion was that it began during the Mexican War, with Marines who were troubled by fighting against children. It's a way of building up an internal conscience, by perpetuating the knowledge of what we've done in other places and times.
It's not perfect, by a long shot. But I think it's good. It sure beats the Army's approach, which is largely non-existent.
Since you mention the Philippine campaign, have you ever had a chance to study the legal conflict between the Army and the Navy in that little mess? The Navy (and by extention the Marines) had a policy that "the Constitution follows the flag," and that was their guide in the Philippines. The Army, by contrast, went in using policies based on the Indian Wars, with no Constitutional protections afforded to the Filippino people. The two different views eventually led to a US Supreme Court case. The Supreme Court found for the Army, and that decision is having repercussions in Iraq today.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 09:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 10:06 am (UTC)I think the incident also is mentioned in Al Millett's book, Semper Fidelis. That may be in your university library. I don't think it gets covered in J. Robert Moskin's generally excellent US Marine Corps Story.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 03:36 pm (UTC)BTW, I dunno if our troops' war crimes are about Big White Hunter or just the nature of war. As other people pointed out, every nation does this sort of thing in every war. Do you happen to know whether we refrained from similar acts in occupied Germany, Vichy France, & Italy?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 03:48 pm (UTC)But systematic abuse of prisoners, as far as I can remember, only happened when the US was occupying places where the local population was largely non-white. That suggests a racial dimension to the treatment.
Take other countries. The Nazis, of course, felt they were superior to everyone else, and that justified atrocities committed during World War II. The British routinely abused and killed uppity natives in their colonies in Africa and India. The Japanese tortured and abused those under their occupation in the Pacific during World War II as well, and the Japanese cultural propaganda at the time was that they were superior to other races - including the Chinese.
Race is obviously a factor, but to say that the abuses are racially motivated is to miss one other cause, that in all these cases there is an element of resistance to the occupying forces' rule. The segments of the local population who are quiet don't get kicked around as much. As always, we have to look at an interaction of various causes and motivations. Call it Imperalism, Paternalism, Manifest Destiny, the Plan for a New American Century, the White Man's Burden, the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, ultimately it boils down to, "We're bigger, we're better, we know what's good for you, so shut up and take it or we'll beat the crap out of you."
no subject
Date: 2004-05-04 04:35 pm (UTC)Seriously, sounds right.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 09:13 am (UTC)Oh, that guy in the trailer was Jonathan Pryce, but he didn't play the Doctor in "Curse of Fatal Death" - he was the Doctor's arch enemy, the Master.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 02:27 pm (UTC)(I think my favorite on the Doctor list was actually Jim Broadbent.)