So he got paid... did he show up?
Jul. 24th, 2004 08:15 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Bush 1972 payroll records 'found'
Yeah, they've released the payroll records after people put up a stink about how convenient it was that these records relating to Bush's 1972 training period were "destroyed" while being preserved, but as it turns out, these just say he was paid, not that he was actually there. So what is that claim - that the Pentagon said a few weeks ago when they said that the documents "could have" settled the dispute - really worth? Turns out they couldn't have. Not in the slightest. Sooooo.... worth bupkis. I'm just saying.
Was. He. There? That's what we really want to know, guys. You know that. We know that. So stop pussyfooting around.
The US defence department has released payroll records relating to President George W Bush's service in the Air National Guard in 1972.You know, I'm going to sound like a whiner who's not satisfied, but... I'm not satisfied. Whine.
Earlier this month the Pentagon said it had inadvertently destroyed the documents, but a spokesman said they have been found in the city of Denver.
Correspondents say they do not shed light on Mr Bush's movements that year.
Democrats have accused the president of ducking the draft call to Vietnam in favour of less dangerous duties.
The White House has released some records in a bid to refute the charges.
'Clerical error'
In 1972 Mr Bush moved to Alabama to work on a political campaign, and opponents say he failed to turn up for guard duties during this time.
The records do not show whether he attended training with the Alabama unit that July, August and September because attendance records are kept separately from payroll records.
A defence spokesman blamed a clerical error for the Pentagon's previous failure to find the microfilm payroll records.
"We're talking about a manual process for records that are over 30 years old," Bryan Hubbard said.
Previously, the Pentagon said the microfilm containing the records had apparently disintegrated as staff were trying to preserve it from decay.
Yeah, they've released the payroll records after people put up a stink about how convenient it was that these records relating to Bush's 1972 training period were "destroyed" while being preserved, but as it turns out, these just say he was paid, not that he was actually there. So what is that claim - that the Pentagon said a few weeks ago when they said that the documents "could have" settled the dispute - really worth? Turns out they couldn't have. Not in the slightest. Sooooo.... worth bupkis. I'm just saying.
Was. He. There? That's what we really want to know, guys. You know that. We know that. So stop pussyfooting around.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-24 02:32 pm (UTC)Yep. Grecian meaning of "argue?" Nice urn of phrase.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-24 02:45 pm (UTC)