More Swiftness
Aug. 20th, 2004 11:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From the New York Times:
Friendly Fire: The Birth of an Anti-Kerry Ad
Not quoted here because the article is worth reading in full.
The links between Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and the Bush campaign aside - that really shouldn't surprise anyone; that 527 groups have common financial or communal links to the politicians they support also shouldn't surprise anyone; and connection does not equate coordination - what's interesting is the section a bit further down on the Times's checking into Larry Thurlow's story surrounding his and Kerry's Bronze Star and a neat summary of the problems with SBVT's allegations.
Friendly Fire: The Birth of an Anti-Kerry Ad
Not quoted here because the article is worth reading in full.
The links between Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and the Bush campaign aside - that really shouldn't surprise anyone; that 527 groups have common financial or communal links to the politicians they support also shouldn't surprise anyone; and connection does not equate coordination - what's interesting is the section a bit further down on the Times's checking into Larry Thurlow's story surrounding his and Kerry's Bronze Star and a neat summary of the problems with SBVT's allegations.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-20 08:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-20 12:46 pm (UTC)I think that it's important to separate truth from fiction and to understand what may not be proveable by either side, given the time that has elapsed since the events occurred.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-20 01:10 pm (UTC)By 1994, he was already saying that he was "near" Cambodia. So it's not really a recent retraction, such as it is.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-20 01:30 pm (UTC)I have seen claims that he said he was in Cambodia for Christmas "numerous" times during the 70s and 80s, but can't document this. That wouldn't change your point that he stopped saying it by 1994.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-21 02:57 pm (UTC)"We were told, 'Just go up there and do your patrol,'" Kerry told Diamond. "Everybody was over there [in Cambodia]. Nobody thought twice about it." Five years later, in a September 4, 1997, Senate subcommittee hearing on Cambodian politics, Kerry began his remarks by saying, "I first was introduced to Cambodia when I spent Christmas Eve of 1968 in a river in Cambodia during the Vietnam conflict." Kerry was impressed with what he saw. "I found it to be a rather remarkable and very beautiful country which had an allure to me, and to many others," he told his fellow lawmakers, "which has been sustained through those years."
In June 2003, Kerry repeated his story to Boston Globe reporter Michael Kranish, who later included it in John F. Kerry, the biography he wrote with coauthors Brian Mooney and Nina Easton. Kerry told Kranish that his adventures on December 24, 1968, began "near Cambodia," when his Swift boat was ambushed by Viet Cong. But later, Kerry said, "he had gone several miles inside Cambodia, which theoretically was off limits." Kerry's incursion put him in a cynical mood. He told Kranish he had sent a "sarcastic message" to his superiors from the Navy's "most inland" unit.
The complete article is in The Weekly Standard.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-20 01:15 pm (UTC)If it's not provable, they shouldn't have started yammering about it to begin with, considering what's been on the record for 35 years. Coming up with this now, when he's running for President (and contradicting their own public statements at other times), those are smear tactics.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-21 11:07 am (UTC)Van whatshis is almost as good: "Kerry ran away and came back and fished Rassman out of the water a few yards away from me . . . while I sat on my thumb and watched him drown." Yeah, that one makes sense too.
Schmucks.
OTOH, I am peeved at Kerry for claiming that by not violating McCain-Feingold, Bush is condoning the message. Noncoordination menas noncoordination. This is a sleazy tactic.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-21 11:20 am (UTC)Rationally, you know the 527s are legal, and there's no real evidence to show SBVT is coordinating with the Bush campaign, save for a few financial and communal connections. But in the mind of the average swing voter, legalities are irrelevant and the whole Bush camp is one hulking monolith. Rationalism plays little part in this kind of thinking. This says a lot more about the state of informed enfranchisement in America than it does about Kerry or Bush.